Dutch legal research and document intelligence

Legal work,with the sourcestill attached.

Research Dutch law and question your own documents. Karm AI keeps the supporting passages visible so every finding can be reviewed before it is used.

See what Karm AI doesOpen your workspace

AI-assisted research, not legal advice. A legal professional remains in control.

Research memorandum

When does a breach justify termination?

Question

A supplier misses an agreed delivery deadline. Can the customer terminate the contract and recover its losses?

Termination may be justified where the breach is sufficiently serious. If performance remains possible, the supplier normally must first be placed in default, unless the deadline was legally final or another exception applies. Any claim for damages requires a separate assessment.

Primary authority

Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 6, artikelen 74, 81-83 en 265

Lexical + semantic + graph retrieval Review sources before relying on output

Three focused workflows

Start with the legal task, not the technology.

Each workspace has a distinct evidence boundary. Karm AI Chat researches public legislation. SearchAI works only with the documents you choose, while Documents prepares and organizes that private content.

01

Karm AI Chat

Research Dutch law

Ask a legal question. Karm AI plans the research, combines lexical, semantic, and graph retrieval, then returns a cited answer.

Search scope: indexed Dutch and EU legislation

See workflow
02

SearchAI

Ask about your documents

Select uploaded files or a knowledge base, ask a question, and inspect the exact passages used for the answer.

Search scope: your selected documents and knowledge bases

See workflow
03

Documents

Build a working evidence library

Upload, extract, organize, and track the private material that powers scoped document research.

Foundation: processed text, metadata, and access-controlled collections

See workflow

Method

Research first.
Answer second.

Karm AI is designed around a reviewable chain from question to evidence to output. The model does not replace the source or the professional reading it.

  1. I

    Define the evidence

    Choose the legal corpus, a knowledge base, or selected documents. The evidence scope is visible before work begins.

  2. II

    Retrieve before generating

    The relevant pipeline searches, ranks, and filters source material first. Generation receives evidence, not an empty prompt.

  3. III

    Review the work product

    Read the answer beside its passages. Open the source, challenge the interpretation, and retain human judgment.

Public legal evidence

Karm AI Chat

Structured Dutch and EU legislation, article relationships, and semantic vectors stored in PostgreSQL and pgvector.

Private operational evidence

SearchAI and Documents

Uploaded documents and knowledge bases, constrained by the signed-in user's organization and explicit document scope.

A working conversation

Bring one real legal task. We will trace it from question to source.

Request a focused walkthrough using one of your real questions or documents. You will see the source boundary, retrieval path, and reviewable output end to end.

Request a walkthroughEmail directly